#agency Life India

[levyconindia001]

Web designing agency in Gurgaon

Our web designing agency in Gurgaon offers top-notch services to help businesses establish a strong online presence. With a team of experienced designers and developers, we create custom websites that are not only visually appealing but also highly functional and user-friendly. From responsive design to e-commerce solutions, we cater to a wide range of needs to ensure that our clients have a website that truly represents their brand and helps them achieve their business goals.

[seo-ex]

GHT is a leading Germany Nurses Recruitment Agency in India, owing to its unwavering commitment to excellence, comprehensive services.

[townpostin]

Baharagora Youth Trapped in Dubai, Seeks Help for Safe Return

Ishtiyaq Ahmed, a youth from Bahargora’s Chingra Panchayat, stranded in Dubai after being misled by an agency, seeks help for a safe return to India. Ishtiyaq Ahmed, the son of Abdul Kayyum from Chingra Panchayat in Baharagora, who went to Dubai in search of a better future, has found himself trapped in difficult circumstances. JAMSHEDPUR – Ishtiyaq Ahmed, a resident of Chingra Panchayat in…

[nando161mando]

"Sanatan Dharma is the bedrock on which untouchability, caste violence, misogyny and rape culture get religious sanction in India."

— Meena Kandasamy

[mediaheights]

Biodiversity is the foundation of our food, health, and peaceful life.

On the occasion of International Day for Biological Diversity, we reaffirm our commitment to saving Our Biodiversity, Our Food, and Our Health.

Happy World Biodiversity Day! Build your brand with digital media & take the benefits of social media branding contact Media Heights. By Mediaheightspr.com

Inboundmarketing #MEDIAHEIGHTS #digitalmarketingcompany #searchengineoptimization #content #instagrammarketing #advertisingagency #web #MEDIAHEIGHTSPRCOM #best #public #relation #agency #in #chandigarh #mohali #punjab #north #india #buildingrelationships #globally #customer #internetbanding — at media heights #smo #branding #facebook #twitter #marketingonline #brand #searchengineoptimization #internetmarketing #follow #digitalagency #marketingagency #motivation #digitalmarketingtips #onlinebusiness #websitedesign #marketingonline #brand #searchengineoptimization #content #instagrammarketing #advertisingagency #web #technology #onlinebranding #branding360degree #SEO #SEObrandingagency #websiteranking #websitetrafic #Digitalmarketing #mediaheights #OnlineAdvertising #instagrammarketing #advertisingagency #web #marketingonline #brand

[rhsoftech2024]

Benefits of Digital marketing course in today‘s world

Digital marketing has revolutionized the way businesses promote their products and services, offering a myriad of benefits and advantages over traditional marketing methods. From enhanced targeting capabilities to cost-effectiveness, here are some of the key benefits of digital marketing:

: One of the primary advantages of digital marketing is its ability to precisely target specific demographics. Through data analytics and tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Insights, marketers can gather detailed information about their audience's preferences, behaviors, and demographics. This allows for highly targeted campaigns that are more likely to resonate with the intended audience.

Cost-Effectiveness: Digital marketing typically offers a higher return on investment (ROI) compared to traditional marketing channels. With digital advertising platforms such as Google Ads and social media advertising, businesses can set precise budgets and only pay when their ads are clicked or seen by users. This level of control over spending ensures that marketing efforts are cost-effective and efficient.

: Unlike traditional marketing methods, digital marketing allows for real-time tracking and analysis of campaign performance. Marketers can easily monitor key metrics such as website traffic, conversion rates, and engagement levels. This data-driven approach enables businesses to make informed decisions and optimize their marketing strategies for better results you can digital marketing near you , with in your budget

Global Reach: With the internet connecting people across the globe, digital marketing offers businesses the opportunity to reach a vast and diverse audience. Through channels such as social media, email, and search engines, companies can expand their reach beyond geographical boundaries and target customers worldwide.

Flexibility and Adaptability: Digital marketing channels are highly flexible and can be easily adjusted to accommodate changing market trends and consumer preferences. Whether it's updating ad creatives, refining targeting parameters, or experimenting with new tactics, digital marketers have the agility to adapt their strategies in real-time.

In conclusion, digital marketing offers a wide range of benefits, including enhanced targeting, cost-effectiveness, measurable results, global reach, flexibility, engagement, accessibility, and opportunities for continuous improvement. Whether you're a digital marketing expert or a business owner looking to expand your online presence, embracing digital marketing strategies can help you achieve your goals effectively and efficiently.

[ambition-finserve]

Unlocking Financial Success: Finding the Best Mutual Fund Distributor in Beawar

In the dynamic landscape of financial markets, making informed investment decisions is crucial for achieving long-term financial goals. For residents of Beawar, a key concern is often finding the right financial partner to guide them through the complex world of mutual funds. In this pursuit, identifying the best mutual fund distributor becomes paramount.

Navigating the Financial Maze: The Need for Expert Guidance

Beawar, like any other city, is home to a diverse population with varying financial aspirations. Many individuals face a common challenge: the lack of financial expertise to make sound investment decisions. This gap often leads to missed opportunities and suboptimal investment choices. Enter mutual funds – a popular and accessible investment avenue for those seeking to grow their wealth.

Why Do You Need a Mutual Fund Distributor in Beawar?

Choosing the right mutual fund distributor is akin to having a financial guide by your side. Here's why you need one:

Expertise Matters: Mutual funds can be complex, with various schemes catering to different risk appetites. An experienced mutual fund distributor in Beawar possesses the knowledge to align your investment goals with the most suitable funds.

Customized Solutions: A skilled distributor understands that one size does not fit all. Every individual has a unique financial situation, so he/she customizes the investment strategy and the portfolio according to the needs. It can be a short-term or long-term objective.

Risk Mitigation: Investing always involves an element of risk. A proficient mutual fund sip advisor in Beawar helps you navigate these risks by providing insights into market trends and adjusting your portfolio accordingly.

Benefits of Choosing the Best Mutual Fund Distributor

Optimized Returns: With a deep understanding of market dynamics, the best mutual distributor can identify opportunities that maximize returns while minimizing risks.

Portfolio Diversification: It is a key investment strategy to help individuals minimize the risk and improve returns. A skilled distributor helps you diversify across different asset classes, ensuring a well-balanced and resilient portfolio.

Regular Monitoring: Financial markets are dynamic, and staying updated is essential. Your chosen distributor keeps a vigilant eye on your investments, making timely adjustments to capitalize on emerging opportunities or mitigate potential losses.

Conclusion: Partnering for Financial Success

Choosing the best mutual fund distributor is not just a prudent decision; it's a step toward financial empowerment. At Ambition Finserve, we understand the unique financial landscape of Beawar and are committed to guiding you toward your financial aspirations. Explore the world of mutual funds with confidence, knowing that you have a trusted partner by your side.

Embark on your financial journey with Ambition Finserve – Your Gateway to Financial Excellence.

[travelvanindia]

make dreams comes true..... travel van is your best choice in travel partner..........

https://travelvanindia.000webhostapp.com/

[chic-beyond-the-wall-oc-acct]

So, project 2025 has been deleting their PDFs but a few lovely people have posted the list of books they want to ban and other than the fact that the entire list is stupid, here's some that stuck out to me + the reasons listed next to them. Most of the books on the list are lgbtq+ books which one would expect to find there, so I just did ones I didn't expect.

The Holy Bible - Challenged for religious beliefs and graphic content.

A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin - Sexual violence, political intrigue.

Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson - Death and religious content.

Captain Underpants series by Dav Pilkey - Toilet humor and "disobedience."

Doctor Zhivago by Boris Pasternak - Critique of the Russian Revolution.

Deadly Deceits by Ralph McGehee - Former CIA agent's critiques of the agency.

Emma by Jane Austen - Complex gender themes, social critique.

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury - Censorship and media manipulation by the government.

Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling - Accusations of promoting witchcraft.

Howl by Allen Ginsberg - Explicit sexual content, anti-establishment themes

Hop on Pop by Dr. Seuss - Concerns over violence against parents.

I Am Not Your Perfect Mexican Daughter by Erika L. Sánchez - Mental health, sexual content.

It's Perfectly Normal by Robie H. Harris - Sex education content.

It's So Amazing! by Robie H. Harris - Sex education content.

None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen - Discusses alleged hidden global power structure.

None Dare Call It Treason by John A. Stormer - Anti-communist and conspiracy-focused.

One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - Critique of Soviet labor camps.

Operation Paperclip by Annie Jacobsen - Exposes secret U.S. program involving former Nazis.

My Brother Sam Is Dead by James Lincoln Collier - Violence, anti-war themes.

Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt vonnegut- Anti-war themes.

Spycatcher by Peter Wright - Ex-MI5 agent's account of intelligence operations.

The Art of Happiness by the Dalai Lama - Criticism of religion, perceived political messages.

The Awakening by Kate Chopin - Female independence, sexuality.

The Book of Night Women by Marlon James - Slavery, graphic violence.

The Enchanted Forest Chronicles by Patricia C. Wrede - Magic, feminism.

The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein - Themes of selfishness, parenting.

The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy - Examines class and caste issues in India.

The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood - Critique of religious extremism and patriarchy.

The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas - Examines police violence and racial injustice

The Hunger Games Series by Suzanne Collins - Depicts oppressive government and rebellion.

The Phantom Tollbooth by Norton Juster - Political subtext, wordplay.

The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver - Critique of colonialism and missionary work.

The Power and the Glory by Graham Greene - Critique of religion and political oppression

The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle - Religious critique.

The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli - Seen as a critique of political ethics.

The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare - Often challenged for themes of submission of women in marriage.

Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer - Themes of violence, supernatural elements.

V for Vendetta by Alan Moore - Political rebellion, violence.

War is a Racket by Smedley D. Butler - Critique of war profiteering.

Where the Sidewalk Ends by Shel Silverstein - Dark humor, "rebellious" themes.

Where the Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak - Themes of rebellion, dark imagery.

Where's Waldo? by Martin Handford - Alleged inappropriate illustrations.

White Noise by Don DeLillo - Critique of consumerism and modern society.

Women Who Run with the Wolves by Clarissa Pinkola Estes - Feminist themes.

Yertle the Turtle by Dr. Seuss - Seen as political allegory.

Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis - Critique of authority and societal norms.

[doberbutts]

I’m wondering if you have thoughts on James Baldwin’s “open letter to the born again”? I’m struggling a bit with what his point is in that piece; it feels kinda dismissive on Jewish zionists agency in creation of Israel? But I may be missing parts or not getting things

The text in question.

And the segment I think anon is struggling with:

I know what I am talking about: my grandfather never got the promised “forty acres, and a mule,” the Indians who survived that holocaust are either on reservations or dying in the streets, and not a single treaty between the United States and the Indian was ever honored. That is quite a record.

Jews and Palestinians know of broken promises. From the time of the Balfour Declaration (during World War I) Palestine was under five British mandates, and England promised the land back and forth to the Arabs or the Jews, depending on which horse seemed to be in the lead. The Zionists—as distinguished from the people known as Jews—using, as someone put it, the “available political machinery,’’ i.e., colonialism, e.g., the British Empire—promised the British that, if the territory were given to them, the British Empire would be safe forever.

But absolutely no one cared about the Jews, and it is worth observing that non-Jewish Zionists are very frequently anti-Semitic. The white Americans responsible for sending black slaves to Liberia (where they are still slaving for the Firestone Rubber Plantation) did not do this to set them free. They despised them, and they wanted to get rid of them. Lincoln’s intention was not to “free” the slaves but to “destabilize” the Confederate Government by giving their slaves reason to “defect.” The Emancipation Proclamation freed, precisely, those slaves who were not under the authority of the President of what could not yet be insured as a Union.

It has always astounded me that no one appears to be able to make the connection between Franco’s Spain, for example, and the Spanish Inquisition; the role of the Christian church or—to be brutally precise, the Catholic Church—in the history of Europe, and the fate of the Jews; and the role of the Jews in Christendom and the discovery of America. For the discovery of America coincided with the Inquisition, and the expulsion of the Jews from Spain. Does no one see the connection between The Merchant of Venice and The Pawnbroker? In both of these works, as though no time had passed, the Jew is portrayed as doing the Christian’s usurious dirty work. The first white man I ever saw was the Jewish manager who arrived to collect the rent, and he collected the rent because he did not own the building. I never, in fact, saw any of the people who owned any of the buildings in which we scrubbed and suffered for so long, until I was a grown man and famous. None of them were Jews.

And I was not stupid: the grocer and the druggist were Jews, for example, and they were very very nice to me, and to us. The cops were white. The city was white. The threat was white, and God was white, Not for even a single split second in my life did the despicable, utterly cowardly accusation that “the Jews killed Christ’’ reverberate. I knew a murderer when I saw one, and the people who were trying to kilI me were not Jews.

But the state of Israel was not created for the salvation of the Jews; it was created for the salvation of the Western interests. This is what is becoming clear (I must say that it was always clear to me). The Palestinians have been paying for the British colonial policy of “divide and rule” and for Europe’s guilty Christian conscience for more than thirty years.

Finally: there is absolutely—repeat: absolutely—no hope of establishing peace in what Europe so arrogantly calls the Middle East (how in the world would Europe know? having so dismally failed to find a passage to India) without dealing with the Palestinians. The collapse of the Shah of Iran not only revealed the depth of the pious Carter’s concern for “human rights,” it also revealed who supplied oil to Israel, and to whom Israel supplied arms. It happened to be, to spell it out, white South Africa.

Well. The Jew, in America, is a white man. He has to be, since I am a black man, and, as he supposes, his only protection against the fate which drove him to America. But he is still doing the Christian’s dirty work, and black men know it.

My friend, Mr. Andrew Young, out of tremendous love and courage, and with a silent, irreproachable, indescribable nobility, has attempted to ward off a holocaust, and I proclaim him a hero, betrayed by cowards.

For context: Andrew Young, considered the right hand of MLK Jr, had a longstanding and occasionally fraught relationship with the Jewish community. He stepped down from Congress shortly after being forced to choose between voicing support for Palestine and continuing to work towards black-jewish interests by his constituents and fellow politicians, as he felt very strongly about supporting both. This was a fairly unpopular move. While I don't believe he ever called himself Jewish by the strictest sense, he was actively involved in Jewish communities and the known "white" ancestry within him is a Polish Jew in his great grandparents.

To be honest, I don't really see much a problem with this as I think it fairly closely matches up not only with my understanding of the history of this problem but also my own country's part in it as well as my personal feelings on it decades later. It pretty blatantly says that Zionism is utilizing a machination of white supremist colonism due to the extensive history of antisemitism and having had the ancestral land dangled in front of them like bait on a hook from the British Empire, which owned Palestine at the time. It also goes on to say that many Zionists aren't even Jewish and are antisemitic in nature, but are Christians happy to get rid of as many Jews as possible and how that tracks due to the Christian church's millennia-deep history of antisemitism.

I don't think it lets anyone off the hook. I think it pretty much flat out says this is a problem caused first and foremost by white Christians who hate Jews and Arabs alike and have a vested interest in getting the two populations to fight because it'll be easier to kill off just the one group instead of both of them, if one ends up eradicating the other. It even talks about the friction between the black community and the Jewish community, what caused it, what drives it, how that friction in itself is a tool of white supremacy to hurt us both.

[rideboomindia]

RideBoom has implemented several sustainability measures to reduce its environmental impact compared to Uber and Ola. Some of these measures include:

Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: RideBoom has introduced electric and hybrid vehicles into its fleet, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions and noise pollution. This is a unique feature among ride-sharing apps, as most companies rely on traditional fossil-fuel powered vehicles.

Carpooling: RideBoom offers carpooling services, which allow multiple passengers to share rides and reduce the number of vehicles on the road. This not only reduces emissions but also helps to alleviate traffic congestion.

Route Optimization: RideBoom uses advanced route optimization technology to reduce the distance traveled by its vehicles. This helps to reduce fuel consumption, emissions, and wear and tear on the vehicles.

Sustainable Fleet Management: RideBoom has implemented a sustainable fleet management system that ensures all vehicles are properly maintained, which reduces emissions and extends the life of the vehicles.

Carbon Offset: RideBoom has partnered with carbon offset providers to offset the carbon emissions from its operations. This means that for every ton of CO2 emitted, RideBoom invests in projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as reforestation or renewable energy generation.

Vehicle Scrappage: RideBoom has implemented a vehicle scrappage program, which encourages drivers to retire older, polluting vehicles and replace them with newer, cleaner ones. This helps to reduce emissions and improve air quality.

Driver Training: RideBoom provides training to its drivers on eco-friendly driving practices, such as reducing speed, accelerating smoothly, and avoiding idling. This helps to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.

Partnerships: RideBoom has partnered with local organizations and government agencies to promote sustainable transportation options and reduce emissions in urban areas.

In comparison, Uber and Ola have also implemented some sustainability measures, but they are not as comprehensive as RideBoom's. For example:

Uber has introduced electric and hybrid vehicles into its fleet, but it has not set a target for transitioning to 100% electric vehicles.

Ola has also introduced electric and hybrid vehicles, but its sustainability efforts are more focused on promoting electric vehicles in India.

Both Uber and Ola have implemented carpooling services, but they are not as widespread as RideBoom's carpooling program.

Overall, RideBoom's sustainability efforts are more comprehensive and targeted toward reducing emissions and promoting eco-friendly practices in the ride-sharing industry.

[levyconindia001]

Best Social Media Agency in India

Our social media agency in India is renowned for providing the best services in the industry. With a team of highly skilled professionals, we offer comprehensive social media management solutions tailored to meet the unique needs of businesses. From creating engaging content to managing social media accounts, we ensure that your brand gets maximum visibility and engagement on popular platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

[mariacallous]

India is in the middle of a 44-day exercise to elect its next government, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi tipped to return his Bharatiya Janata Party to power for a third consecutive term. Modi, who aims to win nearly three-quarters of the country’s 543 parliamentary seats, has surprised many observers by using dehumanizing anti-Muslim language on the campaign trail—rhetoric that is more direct than that of his past speeches.

So far, the BJP campaign has focused on creating an irrational fear among India’s Hindu majority that if Modi doesn’t return as prime minister, a share of their private wealth and affirmative action job quotas will be given to Indian Muslims. Modi and his party have doubled down on this narrative at a moment when reports suggest that their quest for a supermajority is unlikely to succeed. The brazen continuation of such anti-Muslim rhetoric differentiates this campaign from the two others that have put Modi in the prime minister’s office.

Hate speech is a criminal offense in India, and it is specifically barred during an election campaign. However, Modi chose the three leaders of India’s Election Commission, the agency charged with conducting free and fair polls, and it has ignored his flagrant violations of the election code. As a result, as the campaign continues through the end of May, so too will Modi’s anti-Muslim tirades. India is expected to announce its election results on June 4.

If the BJP wins and Modi is once again crowned prime minister, his Islamophobic rhetoric will not simply disappear. Many political leaders campaign in poetry and govern in prose, but hateful rhetoric has real-life consequences. Modi’s campaign speeches have put a target on Indian Muslims’ backs, redirecting the anger of poor and marginalized Hindu communities away from crony capitalists and the privileged upper castes. It underscores an attempt to make members of the Muslim minority second-class citizens in a de facto Hindu Rashtra, or state.

These social schisms need only a small spark to burst into communal violence, which would damage India’s global status and growth. Furthermore, Modi’s campaign rhetoric is matched by the BJP’s choice to not put up candidates in Muslim-majority Kashmir, reducing its stake in ensuring robust democracy in a region that New Delhi has ruled directly since 2019. His language will also have a direct bearing on India’s fraught ties with its neighbor Pakistan. Finally, the state-backed ill treatment will likely not be limited to Indian Muslims—meaning that other religious minorities, such as Christians and Sikhs, will also be affected.

Around 200 million Muslims live in India—the second-largest Muslim population in the world, after that of Indonesia. Few mainstream Indian political leaders have plummeted to such depths in castigating these citizens. Modi’s campaign rhetoric makes clear that if he is elected to a third consecutive term, the nation’s Muslims will stand politically disempowered, economically marginalized, and deprived of their constitutional rights.

Modi’s political rise came in the wake of significant violence against Muslims in Gujarat in 2002, when he was the state’s chief minister. Due to his role in the violence, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States all temporarily barred his entry. Leading the party’s campaign to victory in the state assembly in the same year, his campaign speeches were full of crude language against Muslims. But the BJP’s electoral success in Gujarat—winning the next two assembly elections before the launch of Modi’s national campaign—ultimately gave Modi political credibility within an extreme fringe of the party.

By 2011, Modi had started reinventing himself as a business-friendly leader with an eye on a national role. By the time he became prime minister three years later, the narrative of a so-called Gujarat model of economic development concealed his anti-Muslim ideological moorings. Modi’s mask slipped occasionally, but he often spoke with a dog whistle. Mostly, the prime minister reiterated an imagination of India as a Hindu nation. In a post-9/11 world, Modi presented an alternative model of battling Islamic terrorism and consolidated a Hindu majoritarian voter base—delivering a stunning election victory in 2019 after an attempted airstrike against an alleged terrorist training camp inside Pakistan.

This year, Modi has not campaigned on his track record of the past decade or on the party manifesto for the next five years as often as he has attempted to further polarize Hindus and Muslims. In a speech given on April 21, Modi suggested that the opposition Indian National Congress party, if elected, would redistribute property to Muslims. The party would “calculate the gold with [Hindu] mothers and sisters” and transfer it “among those who are infiltrators and have more children,” he said—using terms by which his supporters regularly describe Muslims.

Elsewhere, Modi alleged that Congress was helping Muslims in a plot to take over India: “The opposition is asking Muslims to launch vote jihad,” he said in March. Speaking at a rally in Madhya Pradesh in early May, Modi said that voters would have to choose between “vote jihad” and “Ram Rajya,” the latter being a term referring to a mythical, idealized society that purportedly existed during the rule of Lord Rama, the hero of the famous Hindu epic Ramayana.

The prime minister’s economic advisory council soon released a paper that sought to stoke anxieties about a decline in the proportion of Hindus in India; during the period it covered—1950 to 2015—India’s population actually increased by five Hindus for every one Muslim citizen, but BJP leaders soon deployed the report to further demonize Indian Muslims.

The party’s official messaging has echoed Modi’s rhetoric. A now-deleted video posted on the Instagram account for the BJP’s Karnataka branch this month said, “If you are a non-Muslim, Congress will snatch your wealth and distribute it to Muslims. Narendra Modi knows of this evil plan. Only he has the strength to stop it.” It was followed by an animated clip depicting Congress leader Rahul Gandhi hatching a plan to benefit Muslims at the expense of Hindu groups.

Other Indian democratic institutions have done no better. Despite formal complaints from opposition parties and civil society groups, the election commission has neither punished nor restrained Modi. A petition in the Delhi High Court seeking immediate action against Modi for his “communally divisive speeches” was dismissed, with the judges arguing that it was “without merit” because the commission was already looking into the matter. “We can’t presume that they won’t do anything,” one judge said. But as the elections near the finish line, that is precisely what has happened.

Some observers are likely to dismiss Modi’s recent language as par for the course during an election campaign, when tempers run high. However, most surveys and polls have predicted an easy victory for the prime minister and the BJP; he has no need to resort to pandering to base emotions with toxic rhetoric. In an interview, Modi denied that he had uttered a word against Indian Muslims; he was proved wrong by fact-checkers and video evidence. India’s top political scientist said that through his denials in interviews, Modi is trying to influence the naive chroniclers while he continues with his anti-Muslim speeches for the masses and his supporters. Modi’s No. 2, Amit Shah, insists that the party will continue with this anti-Muslim campaign. By persisting with hateful speech, the BJP leadership is fueling a narrative that is likely to intensify discrimination against Indian Muslims during Modi’s rule.

As prime minister, Modi has spearheaded a project for the political disempowerment of Indian Muslims. For the first time in the history of independent India, the ruling party does not have a single Muslim member of parliament. In the current election, the party has put up just one Muslim candidate—on a list of 440—who is running for an unwinnable seat in Kerala. More broadly, religious polarization has made it difficult for Muslim candidates to win seats in areas without an overwhelming Muslim majority. During recent elections, there have been complaints of authorities barring voters in Muslim-majority localities in BJP-ruled states. Modi’s message to Indian Muslims is unequivocal: You do not matter politically.

India’s Muslims are economically disadvantaged, too. A 2006 committee under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s Congress government found that the Muslim community faced high levels of poverty and poor outcomes on almost all socioeconomic indicators. India’s opposition parties have promised a new socioeconomic survey that could inform future policy without a focus on religion. Modi’s government, by contrast, opted to not conduct even the regular census in 2021—the first such instance in 140 years—due to COVID-19; it has not been conducted since.

Rather than relying on data, Modi and his supporters prefer an emotional response that pitches poor and marginalized Hindus against Muslims. India is a highly unequal country: About 90 percent of the population earns less than the average income of $2,800 per year. This gap has widened under Modi, with the richest 1 percent now owning 40 percent of India’s wealth. By othering Muslims, Modi puts them at risk of becoming the object of other deprived groups’ ire, which could lead to further communal violence. A Muslim man was allegedly lynched in Gujarat during the current election campaign, without making national  headlines.

Islamophobia is at the core of the project to make India a Hindu state. Modi and the BJP frequently weaponize terrorism discourse to delegitimize critics and political opposition. In Kashmir, where the BJP is not running candidates this election, this tactic has fueled anger and hostility. The high turnout in the region seems to be an expression of rage against Modi’s 2019 decision to revoke its semi-autonomous status. When the ruling party leaders conflate Islam with terrorism, there is little chance of extending any hand of peace toward Pakistan, either. Modi and his ministers have vowed to take back Pakistan-administered Kashmir by force if necessary—no matter the grave risk of conflict between two nuclear-armed countries.

Finally, Modi’s rhetoric does not bode well for other religious minorities in India. In the border state of Manipur, the largely Christian Kuki community has suffered state-backed majoritarian violence for more than a year. In Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populated state, Christian priests and worshippers are being jailed, beaten, and threatened by both Hindu majoritarian groups and state police. Meanwhile, the BJP has demonized the Sikh farmers who led protests against agricultural laws in 2020 and 2021, labeling them as separatist Khalistani terrorists. (Last year, Modi’s government was accused of involvement in the killing of a Sikh separatist leader in Canada as well as in an attempted assassination in New York.)

Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians are India’s biggest religious minorities; they make up nearly one-fifth of the country’s population. To disempower these groups would spell the end of the historical bond between India and ideas of universal justice, human rights, and democracy. A majoritarian Indian state—a Hindu Rashtra—would instead make a covenant with bigotry, discrimination, and violence. The bipartisan U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has repeatedly asked Washington to blacklist Modi’s government for its suppression of religious freedom, but the Biden administration has refused to act so far.

However, the evidence is there for all to see—and Modi has further substantiated the charge of bigotry with his campaign speeches targeting Indian Muslims. No matter if the BJP achieves its supermajority, this rhetoric will have significant consequences for India. Modi is serving a warning. The world should take note before it is too late.

[sammygoesviral]

### Why Is ‘Modernity’ Constrained to ‘Sex’ in India?

— Samina Shaikh

#MidnightThoughts

India, a land steeped in culture and tradition, epitomizes unity within diversity. Yet, at various levels, it paradoxically contradicts its foundational beliefs. One such contradiction lies in the pervasive taboo surrounding the term ‘sex.’ This discourse transcends mere gender discrimination, which is a narrative unto itself.

In contemporary dialogues, the term ‘sex’ is often relegated to the realm of the ‘modern,’ rarely broached in everyday conversation. Despite being the cradle of the *Kamasutra* and home to a population exceeding 1.4 billion, societal perceptions frequently tether a woman's character and a man’s masculinity to their sexual lives.

It is commonplace to disparage single women for their sexual agency while simultaneously questioning a man’s masculinity if he remains a 'single virgin.' How is it that, despite the passage of centuries of civilization, a stigma persists around this fundamental aspect of human existence that affects every citizen of India?

Why is modernization, in its truest sense, not reflected in the mindset and cultural approach of our society, even as we remain connected to our roots? Why does ‘modern’ invariably connote an upbringing in an ostensibly ‘free’ environment, while we overlook that being ‘modern’ diverges from being merely ‘modest’? Should we assess an individual based on their attire or manner of speech, or, more significantly, their thought processes?

We often proclaim, “Never judge a book by its cover,” yet we routinely violate this adage. On a more profound level, do we genuinely feel an ‘urge to connect’ with someone following a few interactions based solely on their appearance, or is it their intellectual engagement and outlook on life that fosters this connection? We tend to evaluate one another based on superficial attributes; how many among us are willing to delve deeper, seeking to understand the mindset of an individual rather than merely their façade?

Before encountering someone new, we frequently inquire about their ‘character’ or ‘personality,’ yet we seldom make the effort to engage with them on a one-on-one basis, independent of external references. Is this reluctance a contributing factor to the erosion of genuine connection in our chaotic lives, as we persistently contradict our own beliefs or, simply put, judge before we know?

A person may embody a ‘modest’ demeanor while being ‘traditional’ in upbringing; however, this should not preclude us from assessing their credibility without first understanding the myriad experiences that shape them.

Returning to my initial premise, I often find that discussions surrounding the status of being ‘single’ are fraught with implications of misfortune in love or, conversely, the allure of a ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ existence. Yet, we seldom acknowledge an individual's essence as it stands, allowing it to exist without judgment. Why should discussions of ‘sex’ intrude upon the maintenance of interpersonal relationships? Does being ‘modern’ necessitate access to the intimate aspects of another's life? I implore you to reflect on this notion once more.

[edwinas]

Ignoring whatever season 3 was but it did get me thinking. What if Edwina did consider returning to India because she no longer had a reputation in the ton, no marriage prospects and thus no future. She was humiliated and blamed for the failed wedding and wanted to be free of it all.

This makes Mary open up about her own experiences leaving the ton. How heartbroken she was at being cast out by the only family she knew. How she considered staying in the ton, the only place she knew, but couldn't bear to see her children, especially little Kate, grow up there.

Mary put her children first and never regretted it. She left for India for them to have a happier life, far from the ton and her parents' constant judgement and demands to chase wealth. I imagine Mary's husband growing up in India or at least having connections to it so he is the one who brings up living in India. Mary follows her heart and says yes.

Mary emphasises to Edwina that her future is her choice and she will respect whatever she chooses to do, reaffirming the agency that Edwina was denied in season 2. But she asks that Edwina be sure of her choice and not leave because it's the easier option at that moment. That it's really what her heart wants. Otherwise she might regret it forever.

Edwina realises she doesn't know what she wants. She loves India, it's her home. She grew up thinking she'll settle down in England. After much deliberation, she decides to give England another shot. This time she wants it to be her own terms and not the whim's of a suitor.

She meet Friedrich who falls for her at first sight. But for Edwina it's more complicated given how she does not know what true love feels like. Her only romantic experience was with a man with wandering eyes and she is not ready to open her heart so soon after having it broken. Over time, Friedrich and Edwina develop a close relationship built on mutual trust and respect and Edwina realises she has been in love all along.

[beardedmrbean]

A 50-year-old American woman was found chained to a tree and left to die in a forest in India, police said.

The woman, identified as Lalita Kayi Kumar, was rescued after a shepherd heard her cries on Saturday evening in Sonurli village, located about 450km from India’s financial capital of Mumbai in the south-western state of Maharashtra.

Police registered a case of attempted murder against Ms Kumar’s former husband based on a note scribbled by her at the hospital.

The authorities ascertained her identity and residential address from photocopies of a US passport and a national identity card recovered from her.

”Based on the note written by the woman at the hospital, a case has been registered against her former husband on charges of attempted murder, act endangering life or personal safety of others and wrongful confinement under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS),” Saurabh Agrawal, superintendent of police of Sindhudurg district, said. BNS is India’s official criminal code.

She was transferred to a hospital in the neighbouring state of Goa, Mr Agrawal told the wire agency Press Trust of India. She is “weak” and “not in a position to give her statement”, he said.

Officials do not yet know how long she was left tied to the tree. “The area where she was found had experienced heavy rain,” Mr Agrawal said.

“We have found that the woman, who appears to have been born in the US, had also resided in Goa for some time. We are trying to find out whom she was in touch with in the past few months,” he added.

Police say she appears not to have eaten for several days. The husband, whose name was not disclosed by officials, allegedly hails from Tamil Nadu. Forest inspector Vikas Padve told The Hindu newspaper that while doctors told the authorities she was doing “fine”, Ms Kumar was “suffering from psychiatric issues.

“She is unable to speak and remains under observation,” Mr Padve said.

“She reportedly left her husband after a quarrel,” a police official was quoted as saying by the outlet.

The victim was believed to be living in India for the past ten years, reported the Hindustan Times, quoting officials from the local police station. The authorities have sent a team of investigators to Tamil Nadu and Goa to trace her relatives.